2011년 9월 17일 토요일


Gwanghaegun


By Jonathan Hongsoon Kim


             History, from a certain perspective, can be seen as a series of conflicts. Struggles of people against their surroundings, disagreements amongst individuals, or all out confrontations between groups of people have probably existed for as long as humans themselves. People all try to pursue their interests, and in this process may clash with the interests of others, leading to problems. We have seen this sequence happen countless times n the past and, most definitely, conflicts will continue to exist in the future. What is important is how to deal with these problems when they appear. When caught in a fight, either as a combatant or an observer, certain people have shown ideas and behavior that could wisely lead his or her followers out of the hassle. Solving a conflict was not always achieved by military victory or tactical genius. Certain leaders in history, though not always successful in executing their ideas, have demonstrated surprising insight that could have brought clashes to a very different end.



             Gwanghaegun (광해군, 光海君, 1575 ~ 1641), a king of Joseon, was one these people. In medieval times, the Korean Peninsula was the domain of the Joseon Kingdom. Erected in 1392, Joseon was a state that had its ideological roots in Confucianism. During the early years of Joseon, Confucianism was accepted as little more than an ideal way of life. Scholars studied Confucianism and advocated it to the king and the public; other studies such as science or military technology were also encouraged in order to improve Joseon’s competitiveness as a whole. However, as time passed, the emphasis on Confucianism started to become dominative. Eventually, around the 15th century, Neo-Confucianism had become a solid religion almost, amongst the nobles and scholars of Joseon, with other fields of study being disregarded.

Around this time, the scholars started to genuinely respect China. According to the Confucian doctrine, smaller nations had the duty to serve a larger nation—in this case the Ming dynasty of China—as a “parent nation” and become a vassal state. In early Joseon, people saw China as perhaps a slightly more powerful business partner. They usually agreed to Ming China’s demands, but knew when to disagree—as was the case of King Sejo, who, more than once, refused to meet the Ming’s request for military backup. However, by this time, defying China was almost unthinkable; to be able to serve the larger empire had come to be a duty and great honor.



In 1608, amongst this social ambiance, Gwanghaegun became king. Merely years before his ascendancy, he saw firsthand the horrors of war and the ineffectiveness the Neo-Confucianism based Joseon government; the Japanese invasion of 1592 became the most vicious war in Joseon’s history and destroyed two thirds of Joeson’s territory as well as 500,000 Koreans. Following his ascendancy, he immediately made evident the fact that he was not a traditional Confucian king. He did not directly accept the philosophies his subjects tried to teach him, and he also recruited scholars that were viewed as heathens by his subjects but were talented in other fields of academics, especially military science. However, Gwanghaegun’s greatest test came in 1618, when the Later Jinn dynasty in China declared war on the Ming. The Manchurian people, who established the Later Jinn, in 1616, were considered barbarians by both the Ming and Joseon; their rapid growth and sudden attack on the Ming was unexpected. The waning Ming dynasty was hardly prepared for such an assault and was overwhelmed; the Ming almost immediately requested Joseon’s help. The nobles and military officials had no reason to doubt that Joseon’s best soldiers would be sent to the Ming’s aid. However, Gwanghaegun’s response shocked them. He was cautious; he knew that Joseon, only now recovering from the war with Japan, was hardly in shape for another war. This was the main argument he advocated when defending his position from the nobles, but he had a deeper insight than simply thinking that a war would be inconvenient (Hanguk).

Gwanghaegun wished to initiate international policies that would actually benefit the nation of Joseon. He assessed correctly that siding with the Ming—just because it was the supreme “civilized” nation and the Later Jinn the “barbaric”—was a shortsighted idea. The Ming was gradually losing its superiority in mainland China; it was predictable that the Later Jinn would conquer a great chunk of China, if not the entire continent. Gwanghaegun wished to remain as neutral as possible in such an unstable struggle, and explained this plan of neutrality to his subjects. Regardless of his efforts, the upper class scholars of Joseon refused to acknowledge Gwanghaegun’s logic and continuously argued for supporting the Ming. Gwanghaegun was eventually forced to dispatch troops, but not before secretly cautioning the battalion’s leading general to avoid direct confrontation with the Manchu, and to and surrender when necessary; the general complied and casualties were minimized (Park 161).

However, when Gwanghaegun’s covert orders were discovered, the nobles of Joseon were fed up with their king’s refusal to comply with the Neo-Confucian dogma. They rebelled, using Gwanghaegun’s “treason” against the Ming as an excuse, and chose Injo, a relative of Gwanghaegun and leader of the rebellion, as the new king. Injo immediately took a hard-line stance against the Later Jinn and made sure Joseon did its duty as a vassal. He initiated an all out war against the Manchu, even after the Ming was defeated. Ignoring the suggestions of peace made by the Later Jinn, Injo continued the destructive fight against them. In 1636, following an all out invasion by the Manchu—who now called themselves the Qing—Injo surrendered the nation under his responsibility to the Qing. Injo was forced to participate in a grueling capitulation process. In less than 40 years after the Japanese were barely driven out, the refusal to recognize the reality of the Joseon nobles had brought upon the nation another great tragedy.



Gwanghaegun wished to preserve the relatively weak nation of Joseon that was stuck in a dangerous power struggle. He realized that blindly siding with either side was risky. He tried to remain as neutral as possible and gain what he could for Joseon in the process. Although the Ming dynasty and Later Jinn have both long disappeared in history, I believe that this idea can indeed be implemented to modern day nations, including Korea.

South Korea was traditionally associated with the USA. After Korea was split into two following its independence from the Japanese Empire, the Southern part of the peninsula was influenced greatly by the US and was on the capitalist half of the world during the Cold War. Because of this strong capitalist emphasis, anti-communist sentiment was prominent, and the government was adverse towards nations such as China. Although, after the end of the Cold War, this phenomena has been somewhat reduced, our current president, president Myung-bak Lee, is once again demonstrating great affiliation towards the US and keeping a distance with China (Lee 35). President Lee has, and still is, aimed towards strengthening an alliance with the US, even with the discontent or sacrifice of the Korean citizens themselves (Ecumanian).

However, absolutely favoring the USA over other nations is not that safe of a stance. China is continuously growing in several different aspects, and within due time, could match the US in terms of economy as early as 2035 (Altman and Barboza 5). Viewing China as no more than a communist villain in such an era may be as risky as Injo’s diplomacy. Though not in the form of military invasion, China could express its resentment later on, as was the case of the Later Jinn. As Korea once again finds itself stuck between two potent nations, cautious diplomacy is needed. As with Gwanghaegun’s hesitance to immediately come to the Ming’s aid, it is necessary for a leader of a nation to find a path that would benefit the nation itself, not other nations that it wants to appease or be associated with. The same would apply to modern Korea. Blindly trusting the power of the US is not a wise idea. To maintain good relations with both the US and China, not leaning or being biased towards either, is the way that would probably open Korea up to the most opportunities in the future.

             Gwanghaegun refused to be restricted by the ties of tradition or appeasement when initiating diplomacy that would be practical and favorable for his own He wanted to ensure that his country could keep its sovereignty and dignity in a chaotic situation through policies that focused not on the so-called obligations of tradition, but on practicality. Such policies of practicality and sensibility were Gwanghaegun’s method of dealing with the conflicts he encountered, and this attitude is one that leaders of modern day nations should not be afraid to take.





Works Cited



Altman, Daniel and David Barboza. “That Blur? It’s China, Moving Up In the Pack.” International Herald Tribune December 21st, 2005: 5



Ecumanian, 믿음으로 보는 기독교 정론지 (Mideumeuroboneun Sesang Gidokgyo Jeongronji). 17 Apr. 2008. Web. 09 Ecumanian. Apr. 2011. <http://www.ecumenian.com/>.



Lee, Sug-i. “ 국제 사회에서 앉은뱅이 이명박 외교” (Gugje Sahoeeseo Anjeunbaengidoen Lee Myung-bak Oegyo, Myung-bak Lee’s Diplomacy: A Cripple in the International Society). SisaIN 153(2010): 35.



Park, Si-baek. Joseon Wangjo Sillok 11: Gwanghaegun Ilgi (Chronology of Joseon Kings 11: Chronology of Gwanghaegun). Seoul: Humanist, 2008.



Park, Si-baek. Joseon Wangjo Sillok 12: Injo Sillok (Chronology of Joseon Kings 12: Chronology of Injo). Seoul: Humanist, 2008.



한국역사연구회 (HangukYeoksaYeonguhuei Webzine, Korean History Research Center) Homepage. 5 January 2004. 한국역사연구회., May 2011. <http://www.koreanhistory.org/>

2011년 9월 6일 화요일




Do Schools Kill Creativity?

           Public education, in the sense we know it as nowadays, was first introduced not long after the Industrial Revolution. Governments in Europe—the continent in which the Revolution first started—initiated universal education hoping that this would produce workers that had the skills necessary to perform their jobs more efficiently. The first subjects that were taught in these early compulsory academies were reading, writing, and arithmetic: three fields that are relatively simple yet are useful in the industrial production process. As decades passed, compulsory education became no longer limited to these three subjects; a variety of studies such as the humanities, the sciences, and the arts, were included. This widening of the educational spectrum of apparently provides students with a more diverse choice of studies, but whether or not these options are equally available and valued is subject of discussion.

           In the embedded video above, Sir Ken Robinson discusses the relationship between individual creativity and the current educational system. Sir Robinson has a very critical opinion about the globally common trend in education; he believes that the system is killing creativity. Calling modern public education a process to “produce university professors,” he points out the apparent hierarchy amongst the subjects that are being learned in school.

           The current educational policies around the world stress subjects such as language and mathematics as the most important ones. The next subjects down the ladder are the humanities, such as history or social studies. The arts are at the bottom; the arts are usually taught only minimally compared to math or language, and young students are sometimes discouraged from perusing those fields. This set priority list of subjects, according to Sir Robinson, is imprinted by schools into the minds of the students, leading them to avoid the arts and regard them as inferior. Sir Robinson argues that his is a great problem because the arts are the area in which people can effectively express their creativity.

           I partially agree with Sir Robinson’s opinion. I do believe that the arts are no less important than any other subject and should be treated with the same respect. I also agree that many educational systems, including that of South Korea, tend to take the arts less seriously than they do other subjects. However, I do not believe that this necessarily means that schools are killing creativity. I do not think that things such as music, art, and dance are the only methods of expressing and developing one’s creativity. There can be great innovations in fields such as language or science as well. Although probably not as visible as creative designs of artistic fields, great ideas in the so-called “hierarchically high” subjects are indeed significant in improving the quality of our lives. Also, such academic fields may be easier to approach by the average student compared to artistic ones, which do require some natural talent as well as lots of training and practice.

           Sir Robinson, I believe, is correct when pointing out that subjects are being treated unequally in schools. As a solution, schools and other educational institutes should be able to provide students with artistic talent and interest with the necessary programs to further develop their skills. This does not mean including the same amount of hours of art as math in the annual curriculum. Instead, providing things such as after-school classes for interested students would be more efficient and effective in improving the system.

2011년 9월 2일 금요일

My AP European History Term Paper for the 1st Semster


A European History of the Brewery, Trade and Consumption of Beer



Korean Minjok Leadership Academy

Integrated Program

Kim, Hongsoon

Term Paper, AP European History Class, June 2010





Table of Contents



I.          Introduction

I.1           Introduction to this Paper

I.2           Thesis

I.3           Boundaries

I.3.1     Chronological Boundaries

I.3.2     Regional Boundaries

II.       Background Information

II.1        Introduction to Beer

II.1.1  Definition

II.1.2  Overview of Beer as a Beverage

III.     History of Beer

III.1      Origins

III.1.1     Ancient History

III.1.2     Beer in Ancient Greece and Rome

III.2      Beer in the Medieval Ages and Early Modern Europe

III.2.1     Increase of Popularity

III.2.2     The Usage of Hops

III.2.3     Regulations and Standardization

III.3      Beer in the Renaissance Era

III.4      Industrial Revolution Era Beer

III.4.1     Industrialization of Beer Production & New Techniques

III.5      Modern Day Beer

III.5.1     The Modern Brewing Industry

IV.    Conclusion

V.       Notes

VI.    Bibliography







I.         Introduction



I.1          Introduction to this Paper

             Beer is one of the most widespread and oldest types of alcoholic beverage in the world. (1) It was an incredibly important drink in many European nations during different time periods and continues to maintain its popularity even to this day. This paper will discuss the history of the brewery, trade, and consumption of beer in Europe by examining the changes the beer industry underwent over the ages.



I.2          Thesis

Throughout this paper, I wish to show that the brewery, trade and consumption of beer had much to do with the natural environment of a region and technological development. Also, I will show that the changes in the beer industry led to changes in the culture or society of a civilization.

Thus my thesis would be:

The brewery, trade, and consumption of beer were influenced by a civilization’s environment, culture, and technology and, in turn, influenced the society’s way of life.



I.3          Boundaries



I.3.1    Chronological Boundaries

             I plan to place little to no boundary in terms of time. This paper will examine the overall history of beer, from the ancient times to the modern era.



I.3.2    Geographical Boundaries

             The region I will mainly be focusing on in this paper is the continent of Europe. However, when dealing with the ancient origins of beer, I will write about regions out of Europe, such as Asia or Mesopotamia, because those areas are where beer originated from and thus require attention.



II.      Background Information



II.1       Introduction to Beer



II.1.1 Definition

             According to the Merriam-Webster Online dictionary, the modern definition of beer is “an alcoholic beverage usually made from malted cereal grain (as barley), flavored with hops, and brewed by slow fermentation”. (2) However, beer has existed before the utilization of hops, as will be discussed in my paper. Thus, when talking about periods prior to the introduction of hops in beer brewery, we should not consider hops as a necessary prerequisite for a beverage to be qualified as beer.



II.1.2 Overview of Beer as a Beverage

             Although beer made of barely is the most widespread type of beer in the modern era, beer can easily be made out of other cereal grains. Such usable grains include wheat, maize and rice. (3)

             Beer is one of the oldest alcoholic beverages in history, (4) and retains its popularity as an intoxicating drink to the modern day. It is currently the third most popular drink in the world, next to water and tea (5). Around 1.4 billion hectoliters of beer are consumed annually, the majority of this consumption being performed by nations in Northern Europe. (6)



III.   History of Beer



III.1    Origins



III.1.1      Ancient History

             The first credible appearance of beer happened in ancient China. Pottery jars discovered in the Stone Age town of Jiahu suggest that a crude form of beer, known as kui, was produced there as early as 9000 years ago. (7)

The tablet that The Hymn to Ninkasi was inscribed on. (9)

             Records from ancient Mesopotamian civilizations such as Sumer and Babylonia also show evidence of beer production. Clay tablets show proof that beer brewery was a prominent and respected activity in ancient Sumer. Beer became an important factor in Sumerian culture, with many Sumerian myths, such as The Epic of Gilgamesh, having beer in them and ascribing beer as “a creation of the gods”. Sumerians even had a Goddess of Beer named Ninkasi. The Hymn to Ninkasi, which female Sumerian priest/brewers memorized, serves a dual purpose: to praise the Goddess, and to show the process of brewery. (8)



             The knowledge Sumerians had about beer was passed on to the Babylonians, who also enjoyed beer. Beer was a significant part of their culture, so significant that the Code of Hammurabi includes a law that states that any tavern keeper who lies about the amount of beer he is providing would be drowned. (10) Considering that Hammurabi’s Code deals with issues that were relevant and important in Babylonia, we can see that beer was an incredibly prominent part of the Babylonian society.

             Beer was also crucial in ancient Egypt. Egypt also had a Goddess of Beer named Tenenet. (11) Beer was a universally accepted good in Egypt; laborers who worked on the Giza Pyramids were often paid in beer along with bread. Beer was also thought to have medical effects, and over 100 discovered medicine recipes have beer included as an ingredient. (12)

             I believe that the reason that beer was developed, and was able to be developed, in these regions is related to the fact that these communities were amongst the first civilizations of the world. Agriculture was developed in these areas, providing the people with the grains necessary to brew beer. If these grains are provided, it is relatively simple to make beer; even spitting on the grains and leaving it for some time can create a crude form of alcohol. The reason that beer was often related to religion and myths may have to do with the intoxicating effects of beer. Those that have never experienced the effects of alcohol may have thought becoming drunk was a mystical process that had to do with the Gods. Because of this, many ancient civilizations that had access to beer had deities or rituals related to the drink.



III.1.2      Beer in Ancient Greece and Rome

             Because of its proximity to Mesopotamia and Egypt, as well as its developed maritime trade, ancient Greece is thought to be the earliest civilization in mainland Europe that accepted beer into its culture. Beer probably entered Greece through trade with Egypt, as we can see through etymology. The Greek word for beer is ‘zythos’, which is quite similar to the Egyptian counterpart, which is ‘zytum’. (13) The Sumerian word for beer is ‘sikaru’ which is less similar. (14)

  Writers such as Archilochus and Sophocles left writings about brewing and consuming beer. Sophocles, who lived around 450BC, contributed so greatly to Greek beer-related culture that he was later referred to as “a wise man who invented beer” by Plato. (15) Sophocles introduced the concept of moderation, which is not drinking over a certain amount in each sitting, in beer consumption. Sophocles advocated beer, suggesting that beer become a central part of the daily Greek cuisine, but this idea was not very popular. Wine became more popular than beer, and the Greeks began to view the grainy taste of beer to be inferior compared to the strong flavor of wine.

This idea continued to the Roman Empire, and beer was viewed as a drink fit only for barbarians, while wine was considered to be much more prestigious. This conception was able to exist because the Mediterranean weather of Greece or Rome enabled them to cultivate grapes; this was unavailable to the nomadic tribes of the north, whom the Romans regarded as inferior. This bias that beer is for lower-class people still influences people to this day, and modern nations near the Mediterranean Sea continue to consume much more wine than they do beer. The environment a civilization was located in allowed them to access other beverages besides beer, and this affected their cultural mindset.



III.2    Beer in the Medieval Ages and Early Modern Europe

            

III.2.1      Increase in Popularity

             Beer began to spread to the northern and western regions of Europe as early as 800BC. After Christianity became widespread in those areas, the production of beer suddenly became very popular. This is because Christian monasteries, which were spread all over Europe, began to brew beer autonomously. Monasteries needed an easily-made drink they could provide travelers with instead of water, which was filthy, so they became one of the first organizations to specialize in beer production as an industry. By the 2nd century AD, beer was already a commercial industry, with monks being given the right to sell beer independently. Beer became so significant in European Christianity; saints such as St. Augustine of Hippo, St. Luke the Evangelist, and St. Nicholas of Myra were even patrons of beer brewery. Charlemagne, emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, also trained Christian brewers and set regulations on beer.

             Besides the rise of Christian monasteries, several factors made the rise of beer in Northern and Western Europe inevitable. Because sewage and storage systems during that time period were not sophisticated, water was often filthy and easy to spoil. Alcoholic beverages did not have this problem and thus were ideal when it was necessary to prepare a liquid to store for a long time. Wine was unavailable because grapes were not cultivatable in the environment those nations were located in; grapes were cultivated in regions surrounding the Mediterranean Sea. Since beer could be created with simple ingredients that every civilization had, it was very accessible. Beer could also provide a high amount of calories, which were not easily gained otherwise during medieval times. Thus, the environment and cultural influence led to the rise of popularity of beer in this era.



III.2.2      The Usage of Hops       

             This era also introduced one of the most important changes in beer brewery: the use of hops. Hops are the female flower clusters of a plant called Humulus lupulus. The main role of hops is to give beer flavor and stabilize it at the same time. Hops provide beer with a bitter, deep flavor, and also preserve it, so beer can be stored for a longer time without spoiling.

             The earliest records of hops cultivation date back to 736 in Germany. (16) Hops were first used in monasteries around the 9th century. Before their introduction, a variety of herbs were used in attempts to make beer last longer, but they were far less effective than hops. An alternative would be to increase the alcohol content in the beer, but this is a very expensive and difficult process.

             Because beer could now be preserved for longer periods of time, exporting beer became possible. Germany, one of the first nations to use hops, became one of the earliest to begin the export of beer. Germany, along with longer-lasting, hop-flavored beer, had standardized barrel sizes that made export more convenient. Beer was no longer only produced in small-scale operations in monasteries, but as relatively large operations involving 8 to 10 people. By the 14th century, beer was being produced and exported as a flourishing industry in Germany, with nations such as Holland, Scandinavia, and England being the main purchasers. Cities such as Bremen and Hamburg became cities with flourishing beer production and those cities became the centers of beer export. States including Holland and England also began to produce beer in large scale operations, and by the 15th century, were also exporting beer.

A hop flower cluster (17)




III.2.3      Regulations and Standardization

             As exports increased, governments began to place regulations and standards on beer trade. As mentioned in the previous section, Barrel sizes in Germany were standardized for a more convenient trading process. Many nations also placed standards on the quality or substance of the beer itself.

             England, after the introduction of hops, set the dividing line between beer and ale. Alcoholic beverages that included hops were now called beer, while those without hops were referred to as ale. The dividing line between the two beverages was now made clear, and the Brewers Company of England made sure that this standard was kept. Although this division later became powerless—as in modern times both ale and beer contain hops—it did provide the modern definition of beer.

             In Germany, around this time, an extremely significant rule of beer production was introduced. The Reinheitsgebot, implemented by William IV, the Duke of Bavaria in 1516, was the first rule about the purity of beer, and is still accepted in modern times. The law states that beer can only be made out of the three ingredients water, barely, and hops. The Reinheitsgebot is the oldest food-related regulation that reached modern times, as it became an official German law in 1987. The law is no longer enforced, but it does show that 16th century states of where Germany is now accepted the fact that beer was an integral part of the society, much like how Hammurabi or Charlemagne placed rules about beer centuries before.



III.3    Industrial Revolution Era Beer



III.3.1     
A brewery of the Industrial Era (18)

Industrialization of Beer Production & New Techniques



             The Industrial Revolution was a period of many innovations and technological developments. These developments altered the lives of Europeans in almost every way imaginable, and beer production was no exception. Industrialization introduced many new devices that allowed the beer brewing industry to utilize new methods of production.

             Along with the steam engine, the industrial era also brought forth numerous inventions that helped beer brewery, such as the thermometer or the hydrometer. Thermometers and hydrometers measure temperature and density respectively, and such accurate measurements. Beer with the best quality demanded a certain temperature; temperatures that were only available in the winter. However, the invention of thermometers along with artificial refrigeration allowed beer makers to accurately perceive the temperature and apply refrigeration as necessary. Hydrometers were used to measure the density of the malt. This allowed brewers to assess the traits and yield of beer before finishing it, and this meant that the brewers could produce small amounts of high-quality beer instead of blindly producing beer of mixed quality as they did before.

             The change in malt drying also contributed greatly in improving the quality of beer. Before the Industrial Revolution, malt was dried directly on fire, with fuel such as wood or charcoal being used. While this did definitely dry the malt, it left a smoky odor in the malts, because nothing separated the malt from the rising smoke; this smoky flavor remained in the finished beer and made it less appetizing. Brewers continuously tried to reduce the smokiness, and the invention of the drum roaster by Daniel Wheeler made a kilning process that didn’t leave the smoky scent possible. Another important scientific breakthrough was the discovery of the role of yeast and microbes in fermentation by Louis Pasteur in 1857. Now brewers could understand how the fermentation process worked, and they used this knowledge to prevent the beer from souring. The preservation of beer was greatly improved after this discovery.

             The technological developments during this era led to many new techniques and devices that contributed to the enhancement of the quality of the beer being produced. The overall progress and simplification of the beer brewing process also allowed large-scale breweries to appear. Breweries no longer were limited to 10 or less people, but became large, factory-like operations with many people working at once. This increased the amount of beer being produced, and the international trade of beer thrived. This is an example of where improvement in technology affected beer brewery, and led to great progress in the quantity of the beer being produced and also improving the flavor, sustainability, and overall quality of beer.



III.4    Modern Day Beer



III.4.1      The Modern Brewing Industry

             Beer continues to be an important beverage in modern day Europe. With the exception of Australia and the United States of America, all of the top 15 nations with the highest beer consumption per capita are European, with most of them from Northern or Southern Europe. (19) The Czech Republic, Ireland, and Germany are especially prominent for the amount of beer drunk per individual.

             Many European beer companies, from nations such as Germany, England, and the Czech Republic, maintain traditional recipes and certain brewing methods, and hold great pride in the fact. In Germany, especially, many beer corporations are prideful of adhering to the rule of the Reinheitsgebot, even though the policy is no longer enforced by law. Some breweries also develop new, diverse types and variations of beer utilizing ingredients or methods that were not used before. Beer trade is also greatly prosperous, due to increased sustainability and quality of beer and improved transportation methods. Beer from traditionally beer-producing nations is continuously considered fine.

             Beer is an important factor in many European cultures, with festivals or rituals related to the drink being held. In Germany, beer festivals such as the 16~18 day long Oktoberfest or Gäubodenvolksfest are held and drinking beer is a central part of such celebrations. Other nations also hold small and large-scale events with beer; beer has concretely become a part of their lifestyle.

            

IV.    Conclusion

             Beer is, and has been, an important beverage in European history. The relationship between beer and the society that brews, consumes, or trades it is a mutually influencing one.

             Sometimes, it is the environment culture or changes in the world that affects beer production. Such was the case in Mediterranean Europe, where the environment encouraged wine production over beer and created the social ambience of disregarding beer. The opposite happened in Middle Age northwestern Europe, where beer became popular due to religious and practical reasons. The Industrial Revolution era shows how technology altered beer production. Technological innovations allowed beer makers to try new techniques and develop beer in ways that had never been tried before.

             In other situations, it is beer that influences the culture of a nation. People from many ancient civilizations believed beer had mystical or medical powers and revered it as a divine drink. Some societies had deities dedicated to beer, and through serving them, people were able to practice the brewing process, leading to the easy proliferation of its process; beer was important to those communities in a religious sense. In civilizations such as Babylonia, the Holy Roman Empire, and Bavaria, beer was so widespread and prominent that special laws were created in order to ensure its quality, quantity, safety and so on. Many nations had, and still have, ceremonies or festivities related to beer. These events were, and are, an important part of the culture itself and show that beer is more than a mere drink to those people.

             Thus, we can see that the brewery, trade, and consumption of beer were influenced by a civilization’s environment, culture, and technology and, in turn, influenced the society’s way of life.



V.       Notes

(1) Nelson 2005

(2) ‘Beer’, entry in Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary

(3) ‘Beer’, entry in Wikipedia

(4) Nelson 2005

(5) ‘Beer’, entry in Wikipedia

(6) BelgianShop news 2003

(7) Roach 2005

(8) Bros 2000

(9) Bros 2000

(10) English translation of The Code of Hammurabi

(11) ‘Tenenet’, entry in Wikipedia

(12) ‘History of Beer’, entry in Wikipedia

(13) ‘Beer’, entry in Ancient History Encyclopedia

(14) Sumerian Dictionary

(15) Butler 2006

(16) Corran 1975

(17) ‘Hops’, entry in Wikipedia

(18) ‘How Beer caused the Industrial Revolution’, article from the Economic History Blog on Wordpress

(19) ‘Beer Consumption in Major Countries in 2004 - Per Capita Beer Consumption by Country (2004), statistical research by Kirin Holdings



VI.    Bibliography

1) Unger, Richard W. Beer in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004

2) Arnold, John P. Origin And History of Beer And Brewing From Prehistoric Times to the Beginning of Brewing Science And Technology. Alumni Assn. of the Wahl-Henius Institute, 1911. Reprint Edition, BeerBooks.com, 2005.

3) Eames, Alan D. Secret Life of Beer: Legends, Lore & Little-Known Facts Pownat, VT: Storey Communications, 1995.

4) Dalby, Andrew. Food in the Ancient World from A to Z. Routledge, 2003

5) Nelson, Max. The Barbarian’s Beverage: A History of Beer in Ancient Europe. Routledge, 2005.

6) McFarland, Ben. World’s Best Beers: One Thousand Craft Brews from Cask to Glass Sterling Publishing Company, Inc., 2009.

7) Corran, H. S. A History of Brewing Manchester, GM, United Kingdom: Tyson Books. 1975.

8) Sumerian Dictionary


9) The Code of Hammurabi


10) “Beer.” Merriam-Webster Online.


11) “Beer.” Online Encyclopedia, original article in 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.


12) “History of beer.” Wikipedia.


13) “Beer in Czech Republic.” Wikipedia.


14) “Beer in Germany.” Wikipedia.


15) “Beer in England.” Wikipedia.


16) “Beer.” Wikipedia.


17) “Hops.” Wikipedia.


18) “Ninkasi.” Wikipedia.


19) “Gäubodenvolksfest.Wikipedia.


20) “Oktoberfest.” Wikipedia.


21) “Tenenet.” Wikipedia.


22) “Beer.” Ancient History Encyclopedia.


23) “Inanna.” Ancient History Encyclopedia.


24) “The History of German Beer” Old World Web. 8 May 2011.


25) Butler, Allen, “A History of Beer” Associated Content from Yahoo! (23 May 2006) Web. 15 May 2011. http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/33527/a_history_of_beer.html?cat=22

26) “Beer History” Beer100.com – Your Place for All Things Beer Web. 15 May 2011. http://www.beer100.com/history/beerhistory.html

27) Roach, John, “9,000-Year-Old Beer Re-Created From Chinese Recipe” National Geographic News (18 July 2005)  Web. 24 May 2011. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/07/0718_050718_ancientbeer.html

28) “World Beer Consumption to Top 1.5 Billion HL By 2005”, Belgian Shop News (28 November 2003) Web. 24 May 2011.


29) Bros, Alström, “Ninkasi, the Sumerian Goddess of Brewing and Beer” Beeradvocate (20 December 2000) Web. 24 May 2011.


30) “History of Beer Brewing” Wine Making and Beer Brewing Web. 24 May 2011.


31) “How beer caused the Industrial Revolution” Economic History Blog – Wordpress Blog (28 September 2009) Web. 24 May 2011.


32) Frank, Steve and Arnold Meltzner, “Saints of Suds (“When The Saints Go Malting In”)” BeerHistory.com Web. 24 May 2011.


33) “Beer Consumption in Major Countries in 2004” Kirin Holdings (15 December 2005) Web. 3 June 2001.